2006 December

 

here’s some more fodder for you — on the Dalai Lama & Tibetan
Buddhism’s secret agenda for world domination :-)

http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm

………………………………………

…to point out that what we see is what we BE; our sensorium or drama-field “out there” is essentially a brilliant manifestation of our own consciousness playing through our own physiology — our own devata-particles — and there is only One of Us, and We Love All of Us, and so on and so on…:-)

………………………………………

[Devata-particles] may appear as “point-selves” — localizations or collapsings of All-that-IS into intense bliss-points or I-selves — which upon closer look may resolve into specific classical devata-forms, angel-forms, god-forms, demon-forms, whatever. They are each and all upon heart-embrace nothing other than Us. We are continually creating them, sustaining them, and reabsorbing them. I equate them to the physiology because that is what they are — the intermediaries through which consciousness (Rishi) creates creation (Chandas). Upon closer look and fuller heart-embrace, there is nothing other than Us…

Your glass-houses analogy is a good one, for as the intellect
clarifies and clarifies, it gradually melts into translucence and
transparency, becomes more and more glass-like, more and more heart-filled, surrenders its I-thou distinctions more and more, until as always has ever been, only our Self remains :-)

Anything we see “out there” is a projection of our consciousness
through our physiology; as these devata-particles clarify, the “out
there” must of necessity also clarify. The world is as we are, and
our devata-particles are those portions of Ourself which both
separate Us from the world, and reunite Us All… A rough analogy
would be our consciousness as the projector-light, the devatas as
the film, and the “out there” as the movie-screen. However, in
actuality, paying attention to the light interacting with the film
actually clarifies the film so that it and the screen are also seen
to be nothing but light, and actually not even that — nothing but Us, the Unqualified, emptiful, pure potential to BE :-)
 
………………………………………

[Comment on:…Why do you have to be such a ___?]

Why ask why? At this moment I am apparently a ___. What IS, IS :-)

…MMY, the TMO, Tibetan Buddhism, George Bush, the Dalai Lama — It is all a perfectly pure unqualified movie-screen of US upon which we project Our various dramas.

…I am very happy he [Dalai Lama] gave you 20K [after Katrina]!
But on the other hand I am very sorry if you feel this silly ___
has not helped you…

But on the other hand, are we absolutely sure that this is true?
How do we know it to be true?
How do we feel when we hold that thought in our bodymind?

How would our bodymind feel if it didn’t believe this particular
thought as the absolute truth?

Are various reflections of this statement equally true? You haven’t
helped me… ? You haven’t helped you…?

How about if we see that thought as a wounded particle-self,
struggling to come back Home, and we give it some loving attention, some help?

Love, Light and Laughter to You/Me/All of Us Always…:-)
 
………………………………………

I am not sure I get the distinction … Is your body not viewed in your consciousness, though appearing external to yourself? :-)

………………………………………

Previous post:

Next post: